In Kazakhstan, they “put in place” a former deputy, historian Ualikhan Kaisarov, who presented territorial claims to Russia. The relevant material is published on the telegram channel “Сегодня.KZ”.

“The other day, the former deputy of the Kazakh parliament Walikhan Kaisarov, who considers himself a great historian, gave a speech about the ancient Kazakh lands and the restoration of historical justice. We will not go into detail about his conclusions Let’s just say that, according to his statement, half of today’s Russia, from Siberia and further west to Hungary, belonged to the Kazakhs, who, they say, now have it. moral right to claim everything, how many hundreds of millions of people were there at that time? After all, the territory he is talking about will be three times bigger than Europe. resource.

The author reminds that many historians like Kaisarov worked on Ukraine, according to whom everything he says belonged to Ukrainians.

“Therefore, it is unlikely that they will appreciate what Kaisarov said. Since “up to Hungary” includes the current territory of Ukraine,” the telegram channel further writes.

The author adds that Kaisarov “thus aroused against his person not only the Russians, to whom, in principle, his speech was addressed, but also the Ukrainians.”

The publication notes that when speaking about past Kazakh conquests, the historian “joins Genghis Khan, believing, like all other famous Kazakhs, that this great conqueror was Kazakh.” This is followed by a reminder that the person who was recently visiting Mongolia, the President of Kazakhstan Kassym-Jomart Tokayev during a visit to the Genghis Khan Museum, “called him the great Mongol in black and white.”

“This means that we are flying with all the conquered lands, like plywood over Paris. Because if we conquered anyone, we did it under the leadership of Genghis Khan and his descendants. This means that all these lands should not belong to us, but to the Mongols,” the text continues.

At the same time, this indicates that it would hardly be worth being proud of conquests, since the word “conqueror” means “occupier”.

“That is, we once occupied the lands that Kaisarov is talking about. They came to foreign territories with a war and, killing those who lived there, appropriated them for themselves. But when Kaisarov shouts about the fact that the Kazakhs suffered under the oppression of the Russians, about the “Holodomor” and repression, he does not remember that once we defeated someone, which means we killed, oppressed, raped and hungry (although the Russians did not occupy us. After all, we ourselves asked them. In this regard, does Kaisarov want to look a little further, think about the fact that the descendants of those who have). lived in the territories “up to Hungary” also have the moral right to restore historical justice and can they ever blame us for the suffering caused? And it turns out that everyone owes the Kazakhs, and? that white, fluffy Kazakhs owe nothing to anyone,” the article continues.

The author notes that Kaisarov calls the whole of Altai and the whole of Siberia the original lands of Kazakhstan. At the same time, he recalls that “the Turkish sultan Erdogan“considers these lands Turkish.

“Yes, Kazakh means Turkish. But Turkish does not mean Kazakh. And in these territories Turkic-speaking peoples have lived for centuries, who will be older than the Kazakhs. And they never consider themselves Kazakhs,” he writes on this subject .

Then, already directly addressing Kaisarov, the author asks him a number of questions:

“If we are such great and cool conquerors who conquered everyone “even to Hungary”, why are we left without these territories today? Probably because someone cooler was found and took from us what we once took from someone Don’t you want to think about it, historian Kaisarov? And anyway, for what purpose are you raising this topic? So are you going to look for them? why then do you shake the air? you expect “Erdogan to come and restore order” (This refers to the unification of the Turkic-speaking peoples into one “Great Turan” – approx. EADaily). Of course, he dreams of doing it, but for his Türkiye, not for Kazakhstan.”

The text is followed by hypothetical hypotheses with a suggestion to think about the consequences.

“Good. For example, in Russia they recognized your rightness, Kaisarov, and said, they say, take your lands. And so, if you take and attach Siberia, Altai and all the rest “till to Hungary” to Kazakhstan, will we shoot So how many Kazakhs will be in percentage compared to all other peoples? And won’t Kazakhstan find itself in Russia again because of this? just do it on the contrary, it is good to carry a useless blizzard, historian Kaisarov,” the telegram channel concludes.