The Credit Suisse Board waged war against the Parliamentary Support Commission (PUK) to create a management system that gave birth to a large venture company. Although politics has implemented regulatory measures, since 2012, Too-Big-to-Fail regulation in banking has allowed Krisen to get away with it. Aymo Brunetti, director of the Too-Big-to-Fail expert group, was the head of the PUK.

Personen-Box aufklappen
Personen-Box zuklappen

Aymo Brunetti is professor of Wirtschafts at the University of Bern. Er war früher Leiter Wirtschaftspolitik beim Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (Seco).

SRF News: What is happening in the PUK headquarters?

Aymo Brunetti: Nein, nicht wirklich. The price of the product must be assured by documentary links that extend over a single click, the best at present from the central point of the brother.

During the CS organization of March 2023, you will also be in the criticism: the rules have been modified, and their broader scope, of the Ablauf, has not changed. Bring the PUK-Bericht für Sie new Erkenntnisse?

Nein, der Bericht bestätigt im Wesentlichen meine Sicht. The fusion war is expanding on a global scale, even if it is accompanied by an imminent and unpredictable war. Grossbank’s health and insurance issues are not at all clear, but they are functional. The positive thing is that the Berichte era was not yet felt, a better choice for the interior.

When you have clicks on falls, the risk is that Credit Suisse advisors want to know what’s the big one?

Sagen says it: This is an alternative, and I find that he is a man who has gewählt hat. An upgrade of the CS is also possible as such as abwicklung.

The Ministry of Finance announced in March that CS was without Too-Big-to-Fail-Puffer which has liquidity problems. Do you see the Genauso?

Absolutely. The Too-Big-to-Fail policy is the best and one of them, the man who takes care of it, the bank extends further to machen – and when it wants to, it can TO DO. Management of the broadest standards is clearly established – and this was before the pandemic. Banks are more robust.

After the CS-Zusammenbruch, a group of experts mehr Eigenkapital für systemrelevante Banken vor. Is Switzerland condemned for Zukunft gut aufgestellt?

This is a massive project to alleviate liquidity and build capital to begin with. What is interesting is that the ausländische ausreichend Eigenkapital investment companies have already had a bank that does not have the central bank. Yesterday we were talking about Nachbesserungen nötig. I am stopping this reform for the power plant.

Was the UBS “Superbank” created without the support of the Swiss Volkswirtschaft and an auszulösen global financial bank?

The reform center is an entity without merger for ermöglichen. We once again have one thing to do, now we have to do something wrong with the Schweizer Grossbank. Without any functionality, the Abwicklung has only one management of the State Bank with hundreds of thousands of people and risks taking risks – so it is obvious that it can be done.

When I’m rich verstehe, can I not act on it?

Beim letzten Mal wurde ce Schritt nicht gemacht, et die Glaubwürdigkeit ist derzeit gering. The reforms must be a sure way of ensuring that the Ministry of Finance or the Minister of Finance abroad knows that the path to health can do it.

Das präch führte Brigitte Kramer.